SEARCH
STATISTICS: 433 entries, 757 comments
LAST UPDATE: 01.17.08 11:13am BROWSE BY CATEGORY Christianity Meets Culture (46)Church (62) Culture (16) Guest Bloggers (3) Mission Trips (16) Money (2) Music, Poetry, & Scripture (73) My Life (74) News (51) Observations (25) Postmodernism (31) Recommendation (46) Site Related (12) Social Justice (11) Spirituality (21) ARCHIVES BY DATE September 2007June 2007 April 2007 March 2007 January 2007 November 2006 ADDITIONAL PERSPECTIVES Internet MonkI was thinking... Martin Roth Online Thinking Out Loud Aaron B Smith Next Wave Beautiful Feet e~mergent kiwi Matt Gough ORGANIZATIONS I LIKE MosaicMosaic Life Mars Hill That the World May Know Compass Arts Gospelcom.net Crossroads Ministry National Alliance to End Homelessness PEOPLE I LIKE Charlie PeacockBrian McLaren David Roche McNair Wilson Leonard Sweet Brennan Manning Garison Keeler
| December 17, 2003
Revealing RevelationCategory:
Mission Trips
,
Observations
From the Catholic Encyclopedia Roman emperor and persecutor of the Church, son of Vespasian and younger brother and successor of the Emperor Titus; b. 24 Oct., A.D. 51, and reigned from 81 to 96. In spite of his private vices he set himself up as a reformer of morals and religion. He was the first of the emperors to deify himself during his lifetime by assuming the title of “Lord and God”. After the revolt of Saturninus (93) he organized a series of bloodthirsty proscriptions against all the wealthy and noble families. A conspiracy, in which his wife joined, was formed against him, and he was murdered, 18 Sept., 96. John’s words were poetic in describing the situation to the believers in cities like Ephesus, Laodocia, Philadelphia, Hieropolis, and more because he was trying to protect himself and them. I’m not exactly sure what the mark of the beast refers to, but I know it was probably a reference to the fact that all citizens eventually became subject to buying and selling /anything/ via this form of commerce. In effect, Domitian required everyone to bow to him (as self-professed “Lord and God”) before doing any commerce. An educated guess would tell me that the believers would have no part in doing this. He was so strict about it, that beleivers in the one true God became the victims of his obsession. The book of the Apocalypse was written in the midst of this storm, when many of the Christians had already perished and more were to follow them… So, I think the whole question of the “mark of the beast” in the context of today’s electronic society may be over-inflated. Posted by pablohart on December 17, 2003 01:02 PM |
| Archives | My testimony | |
awesome, paul.
Interesting. I've had these thoughts about Revelation myself. I'm hoping to find a good text that treats the issue from both sides at some point. Of course by bringing up the idea that might not be about our future it alienates a big segment of Christainity.
Truth always alienates a large segment of the population.
hardest part i have with this stuff is figuring out how to tell other people about it without them getting all upset because it's not "what they've been taught all their lives." when i came back from turkey and presented some of this stuff to the adult sunday school class at my church, someone came up to me afterwards and asked me how "they know this stuff." i was so pissed, i didn't know what to say, and still a haven't found the words.
don't worry about the ignorant masses. this is scholarship, which by its nature is exclusive. if your goal is communicate knowledge to others, then the simplest way to do so is to keep studying and living a life that reflects your gained insight. (some) others will eventually want to live like you and will therefore ask what you're studying. they have to want it.
sorry to be such a snob about it but after studying in princeton for a few years and trying to communicate with people who read Left Behind as gospel truth, i can sympathize with your frustration.
nate, i can trust your opinion BECAUSE you've been studying at princeton. thanks. this is helpful!
The other thing I would add Paul, since I'm not quite as snobby as Nathan (close, though), is that there are at least a small handful of people among the laity that really want to learn The Truth (beyond the gospel message - which transends all this other stuff). However, they often aren't ready for it all in one shot. The best thing to do is ask them questions that make them think. Then if they come back with more questions you take them further (ask them more questions). If they don't come back you don't have to worry about them AND they aren't offended.
Often though, people are offended just by the questions... Ah, screw it... maybe Nathan is right. ;-)
Add your comment