This Christian Life

SEARCH


STATISTICS: 433 entries, 757 comments
LAST UPDATE: 01.17.08 11:13am

BROWSE BY CATEGORY

Christianity Meets Culture (46)
Church (62)
Culture (16)
Guest Bloggers (3)
Mission Trips (16)
Money (2)
Music, Poetry, & Scripture (73)
My Life (74)
News (51)
Observations (25)
Postmodernism (31)
Recommendation (46)
Site Related (12)
Social Justice (11)
Spirituality (21)

>> List All Posts by Category

ARCHIVES BY DATE

September 2007
June 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
November 2006

ADDITIONAL PERSPECTIVES

Internet Monk
I was thinking...
Martin Roth Online
Thinking Out Loud
Aaron B Smith
Next Wave
Beautiful Feet
e~mergent kiwi
Matt Gough

ORGANIZATIONS I LIKE

Mosaic
Mosaic Life
Mars Hill
That the World May Know
Compass Arts
Gospelcom.net
Crossroads Ministry
National Alliance to End Homelessness

PEOPLE I LIKE

Charlie Peacock
Brian McLaren
David Roche
McNair Wilson
Leonard Sweet
Brennan Manning
Garison Keeler

View My Portfolio

Follow the Rabbi

Listed on Blogwise

December 17, 2003

Revealing Revelation

DomitianWhen I went to Turkey I learned something that helped me understand Revelation better. It made me see the culture to which Revelation was first written to and what kind of persecution believers of that time were subjected to. I came to the conclusion that while Revelation may be written about /our/ end times, it is probably more likely a reference to the times that the 1st century believers lived in. The “beast” being referred to by John (the author) is probably the Ceasar Domitian because of his merciless and unending defiance against believing Jews and Christians alike.

From the Catholic Encyclopedia

Roman emperor and persecutor of the Church, son of Vespasian and younger brother and successor of the Emperor Titus; b. 24 Oct., A.D. 51, and reigned from 81 to 96. In spite of his private vices he set himself up as a reformer of morals and religion. He was the first of the emperors to deify himself during his lifetime by assuming the title of “Lord and God”. After the revolt of Saturninus (93) he organized a series of bloodthirsty proscriptions against all the wealthy and noble families. A conspiracy, in which his wife joined, was formed against him, and he was murdered, 18 Sept., 96.

When the Acts of Nero’s reign were reversed after his death, an exception was made as to the persecution of the Christians (Tertullian, Ad Nat., i, 7). The Jewish revolt brought upon them fresh unpopularity, and the subsequent destruction of the Holy City deprived them of the last shreds of protection afforded them by being confounded with the Jews. Hence Domitian in his attack upon the aristocratic party found little difficulty in condemning such as were Christians. To observe Jewish practices was no longer lawful; to reject the national religion, without being able to plead the excuse of being a Jew, wasatheism. On one count or the other, as Jews or as atheists, the Christians were liable to punishment.

John’s words were poetic in describing the situation to the believers in cities like Ephesus, Laodocia, Philadelphia, Hieropolis, and more because he was trying to protect himself and them.

I’m not exactly sure what the mark of the beast refers to, but I know it was probably a reference to the fact that all citizens eventually became subject to buying and selling /anything/ via this form of commerce. In effect, Domitian required everyone to bow to him (as self-professed “Lord and God”) before doing any commerce. An educated guess would tell me that the believers would have no part in doing this. He was so strict about it, that beleivers in the one true God became the victims of his obsession.

The book of the Apocalypse was written in the midst of this storm, when many of the Christians had already perished and more were to follow them…

So, I think the whole question of the “mark of the beast” in the context of today’s electronic society may be over-inflated.

Posted by pablohart on December 17, 2003 01:02 PM
Comments

awesome, paul.

Posted by nathan at December 17, 2003 2:17 PM

Interesting. I've had these thoughts about Revelation myself. I'm hoping to find a good text that treats the issue from both sides at some point. Of course by bringing up the idea that might not be about our future it alienates a big segment of Christainity.

Posted by Jamison at December 19, 2003 1:16 PM

Truth always alienates a large segment of the population.

Posted by John at December 22, 2003 2:16 PM

hardest part i have with this stuff is figuring out how to tell other people about it without them getting all upset because it's not "what they've been taught all their lives." when i came back from turkey and presented some of this stuff to the adult sunday school class at my church, someone came up to me afterwards and asked me how "they know this stuff." i was so pissed, i didn't know what to say, and still a haven't found the words.

Posted by pablohart at December 22, 2003 4:12 PM

don't worry about the ignorant masses. this is scholarship, which by its nature is exclusive. if your goal is communicate knowledge to others, then the simplest way to do so is to keep studying and living a life that reflects your gained insight. (some) others will eventually want to live like you and will therefore ask what you're studying. they have to want it.

sorry to be such a snob about it but after studying in princeton for a few years and trying to communicate with people who read Left Behind as gospel truth, i can sympathize with your frustration.

Posted by nathan at December 22, 2003 10:43 PM

nate, i can trust your opinion BECAUSE you've been studying at princeton. thanks. this is helpful!

Posted by pablohart at December 23, 2003 10:13 AM

The other thing I would add Paul, since I'm not quite as snobby as Nathan (close, though), is that there are at least a small handful of people among the laity that really want to learn The Truth (beyond the gospel message - which transends all this other stuff). However, they often aren't ready for it all in one shot. The best thing to do is ask them questions that make them think. Then if they come back with more questions you take them further (ask them more questions). If they don't come back you don't have to worry about them AND they aren't offended.

Often though, people are offended just by the questions... Ah, screw it... maybe Nathan is right. ;-)

Posted by John at December 24, 2003 10:14 PM

Add your comment


Name:

Email:

URL:

When posting please stay on topic. Posts may be removed if content isn't approved.

Ads shown below don't necessarily reflect my beliefs.

 

Archives | My testimony |
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2

RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Creative Commons | My ebay | Wish list | Portfolio | Photos

Center of the earth