SEARCH
STATISTICS: 433 entries, 757 comments
LAST UPDATE: 01.17.08 11:13am BROWSE BY CATEGORY Christianity Meets Culture (46)Church (62) Culture (16) Guest Bloggers (3) Mission Trips (16) Money (2) Music, Poetry, & Scripture (73) My Life (74) News (51) Observations (25) Postmodernism (31) Recommendation (46) Site Related (12) Social Justice (11) Spirituality (21) ARCHIVES BY DATE September 2007June 2007 April 2007 March 2007 January 2007 November 2006 ADDITIONAL PERSPECTIVES Internet MonkI was thinking... Martin Roth Online Thinking Out Loud Aaron B Smith Next Wave Beautiful Feet e~mergent kiwi Matt Gough ORGANIZATIONS I LIKE MosaicMosaic Life Mars Hill That the World May Know Compass Arts Gospelcom.net Crossroads Ministry National Alliance to End Homelessness PEOPLE I LIKE Charlie PeacockBrian McLaren David Roche McNair Wilson Leonard Sweet Brennan Manning Garison Keeler
| January 16, 2004
Comments on “The Passion” by Mel GibsonCategory:
Recommendation
Written by Deacon Keith A Fournier (Article) ******
I really did not know what to expect. I was thrilled to have been invited to a private viewing of Mel Gibson’s film “The Passion,” but I had also read all the cautious articles and spin. I grew up in a Jewish town and owe much of my own faith journey to the influence. I have a life long, deeply held aversion to anything that might even indirectly encourage any form of anti-Semitic thought, language or actions. I arrived at the private viewing for “The Passion”, held in Washington DC and greeted some familiar faces. The environment was typically Washingtonian, with people greeting you with a smile, but seeming to look beyond you, having an agenda beyond the words. The film was very briefly introduced, without fanfare, and then the room darkened. From the gripping opening scene in the Garden of Gethsemane, to the very human and tender portrayal of the earthly ministry of Jesus, through the betrayal, the arrest, the scourging, the way of the cross, the encounter with the thieves, the surrender on the Cross, until the final scene in the empty tomb, this was not simply a movie; it was an encounter, unlike anything I have ever experienced. In addition to being a masterpiece of film-making and an artistic triumph, “The Passion” evoked more deep reflection, sorrow and emotional reaction within me than anything since my wedding, my ordination or the birth of my children. Frankly, I will never be the same. When the film concluded, this “invitation only” gathering of “movers and shakers” in Washington, DC were shaking indeed, but this time from sobbing. I am not sure there was a dry eye in the place. The crowd that had been glad-handing before the film was now eerily silent. No one could speak because words were woefully inadequate. We had experienced a kind of art that is a rarity in life, the kind that makes heaven touch earth. One scene in the film has now been forever etched in my mind. A brutalized, wounded Jesus was soon to fall again under the weight of the cross. His mother had made her way along the Via De la Rosa. As she ran to him, she At the end of the film, after we had all had a chance to recover, a question and answer period ensued. The unanimous praise for the film, from a rather diverse crowd, was as astounding as the compliments were effusive. The questions included the one question that seems to follow this film, even though it has not yet even been released. “Why is this film considered by some to be “anti-Semitic?” Frankly, having now experienced (you do not “view” this film) “the Passion” it is a question that is impossible to answer. A law professor whom I admire sat in front of me. He raised his hand and responded, “After watching this film, I do not understand how anyone can insinuate that it even remotely presents that the Jews killed Jesus. It doesn’t.” He continued “It made me realize that my sins killed Jesus” I agree. There is not a scintilla of anti-Semitism to be found anywhere in this powerful film. If there were, I would be among the first to decry it. It faithfully tells the Gospel story in a dramatically beautiful, sensitive and profoundly engaging way. Those who are alleging otherwise have either not seen the film or have another agenda behind their protestations. This is not a “Christian” film, in the sense that it will appeal only to those who identify themselves as followers of Jesus Christ. It is a deeply human, beautiful story that will deeply touch all men and women. It is a profound work of art. Yes, its producer is a Catholic Christian and thankfully has remained faithful to the Gospel text; if that is no longer acceptable behavior than we are all in trouble. History demands that we remain faithful to the story and Christians have a right to tell it. After all, we believe that it is the greatest story ever told and that its message is for all men and women. The greatest right is the right to hear the truth. We would all be well advised to remember that the Gospel narratives to which “The Passion” is so faithful were written by Jewish men who followed a Jewish Rabbi whose life and teaching have forever changed the history of the world. The problem is not the message but those who have distorted it and used it for hate rather than love. The solution is not to censor the message, but rather to promote the kind of gift of love that is Mel Gibson’s filmmaking masterpiece, “The Passion.” It should be seen by as many people as possible. I intend to do everything I can to make sure that is the case. I am passionate about “The Passion.” You will be as well. Don’t miss it! Posted by pablohart on January 16, 2004 05:21 PM |
| Archives | My testimony | |
Jesus looked at her with intensely probing and passionately loving eyes (and at all of us through the screen) and said "Behold I make all things new."
wow. i am really looking forward to seeing this thing.
I believe that the actual author of this commentary is Deacon Keith A. Fournier at Christianity.com. The original article can be found at the following link.
http://home.christianity.com/topics/christianity_and_culture/73121.html
Nevertheless, I'm really looking forward to seeing this movie.
thanks for the correction, eric! i've made the changes to my post.
Note this is NOT a Paul Harvey commentary
see original article by Deacon Keith Fournier at http://www.deoomnisgloria.com/mt/archives/000143.html
and correction by http://www.hartville.org/thischristianlife/admin/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=241 on sourcing
It appears as if your correction is not quite complete. Your website still says,
Now Paul Harvey tells "The rest of the story".
Paul Harvey's words:
_________________________
What follows are the words of Keith Fournier, NOT Paul Harvey.
thanks, julie. fixed it!
I was touched by your article. I agreed upon it mostly. I've seen the movie myself 3 times so far. It leaves you speachless and it is true to the Holy Scriptures.
But one thing i want to say is that Jews of that time are responsible for what they did, they just don't want to admit to the truth. It has/is/will always be a problem to do so for them. I mean, people don't hesitate to blame Germans for the WWII, and not the whole "humanity". Jesus Christ died for the sins of humanity, but Jesus Christ himself said that their (Jews)sin is greater than what they think it is (when Jesus talks to Pontius Pilate infront of the Jewish (not roman or christian crowd as some rabbies try to twist the facts) crowd that condemned Jesus to death.) The truth is that by Jewish law they couldn't crucify him, so they used Pilate (as an official instrument of the Roman Empire) to realise their biggest crime!!!
Just beacuse you didn't kill with your own hand, doesn't make you less of a killer, does it now??? (it's clear that Jews' want to kill Jesus came out of their wrechless hearts. And just because they skillfully masked their crimes by having Judas as a betrayer, and Roman soldiers having the ones inflicting on a punishment, does not mean they are not responsible for killing in this case. It might look innocent when you pay/send someone to kill, so this way you don't physically touch the object of the killing, but you are still a very source of the crime and is responsible for it; you are the source and in fact you are the actual or more of a killer.)
People shouldn't be afraid to admit to the true facts for the sake of the common motion of anti-semitism.
Yes, Our Lord died for our sins, humanity's sins, but Jews killed them. You can see it throughout the Scriptures, even Old Testament talk about "killing prophets" generation. And the fact that they deny it, makes many people angry. We don't call present-time Germans fascists, even though they were fascicts and admitted to it. We are not hear to judge or hold Jews responsible for what they did in the past, but we hear to say that it's in the Scriptures that they did it. Therefore it's irrelevant even to use anti-semitism in this case.
Moreover, personally i think that anti-semitism is conviniently used by Jews, especially now; because it gives this nation a chance for all the benefits in contrary to others who didn't suffer less than them throughout the history (one of the exmaple, Native American Indians) are not entitled for!!!
Marina, Jesus was a Jew. There is no "they" in this who "killed him."
"It's clear that Jews' want to kill Jesus came out of their wrechless (sic) hearts."
"For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of G-d" - Romans 3:23
"Jews of that time are responsible for what they did..."
"...Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures." - 1 Corinthians 15:3
"the fact that [the Jews] deny [culpability], makes many people angry."
"G-d so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life." - John 3:16
"People shouldn't be afraid to admit to the true facts..."
Some true facts that bear repeating:
1) According to the scriptures we are all culpable for Christ's death.
2) As Nathan pointed out: Jesus was a Jew. Us & them just doesn't follow logically.
3) Jesus calls us to show our witness to his saving work through the demonstration of love.
And finally,
If Christ came with the purpose of saving the world through his own death and if the reason this was necessary was because of our sin why is it important who 'pulled the trigger'?
If Jesus knew what was about to happen well before it happened (Luke 22:42) he had every opportunity to avoid the inevitable. It seems then that he chose to allow the people of that day to follow through with their desire to see him dead (Luke 22:49-51) because he knew something they didn't (John 10:10). He wasn't allowing them to take him because of their short-sighted politically and religiously motivated charges (Luke 23:34) but because we all needed him to die (Romans 3:23, John 3:16).
Jesus didn't die because the Jews of that day had a political or religious issue with him. Jesus died because G-d knew that his death was a necessary step in saving all of us. The Jews didn't kill Jesus. We did.