SEARCH
STATISTICS: 433 entries, 757 comments
LAST UPDATE: 01.17.08 11:13am BROWSE BY CATEGORY Christianity Meets Culture (46)Church (62) Culture (16) Guest Bloggers (3) Mission Trips (16) Money (2) Music, Poetry, & Scripture (73) My Life (74) News (51) Observations (25) Postmodernism (31) Recommendation (46) Site Related (12) Social Justice (11) Spirituality (21) ARCHIVES BY DATE September 2007June 2007 April 2007 March 2007 January 2007 November 2006 ADDITIONAL PERSPECTIVES Internet MonkI was thinking... Martin Roth Online Thinking Out Loud Aaron B Smith Next Wave Beautiful Feet e~mergent kiwi Matt Gough ORGANIZATIONS I LIKE MosaicMosaic Life Mars Hill That the World May Know Compass Arts Gospelcom.net Crossroads Ministry National Alliance to End Homelessness PEOPLE I LIKE Charlie PeacockBrian McLaren David Roche McNair Wilson Leonard Sweet Brennan Manning Garison Keeler
| October 20, 2004
It’s DebatableCategory:
Observations
This is something that has been at the forefront of my thinking this year as I take responsibility for making a decision on who to vote for—Bush or Kerry. Here’s a commentary from Charles Colson: All of the media buzz has been about who won, who didn’t, and who scored points in the three presidential debates. After the first, Kerry had momentum, so said the press. After the third, Bush had it. Why such a fuss over the debates? We’re not electing a debater-in-chief. We’re electing a president and commander-in-chief. The candidate who is best qualified is not necessarily the best performer. He’s the one with the best record and disposition—regardless of debating skills.Posted by pablohart on October 20, 2004 11:02 AM |
| Archives | My testimony | |
thanks, robyn. i'll have to give a listen to that message.
It looks like you really had a nice time.
Add your comment